UK Risks Losing Crypto Race Without Clear Rules
Ambition to Be a “Global Crypto Hub” Clashes With Slow Policy
The UK government’s ambition to establish itself as a “leading global crypto hub” is faltering amid slow policy development and fragmented regulation, raising concerns that talent, capital and innovation could migrate to more decisive jurisdictions.
The stakes are high. While the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has taken a more structured role in guiding the sector, the government’s piecemeal approach risks leaving Britain behind the U.S., the EU and Singapore.
Lofty Goals, Modest Delivery
The UK’s Draft Statutory Instrument (SI) was designed to provide a framework for crypto regulation and signal openness to innovation. In practice, however, the measure has been described by industry participants as a modest step forward.
Institutions continue to wait for clarity on listed crypto products. Although the FCA opened retail access to crypto exchange-traded notes (ETNs) in August, crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain banned in the UK, even as demand grows.
Meanwhile, DeFi regulation remains undefined, leaving firms uncertain about how to operate across decentralized and centralized finance boundaries. Added to that, heavier reporting requirements — including automated tax reporting to HMRC — risk driving investors away from UK-based exchanges toward jurisdictions with lighter regimes.
Unless policymakers strike the right balance between consumer safeguards and innovation, Britain’s crypto hub aspirations may be eclipsed by international competitors.
FCA’s More Engaged Approach
While the government’s legislative progress has been sluggish, the FCA has shown willingness to engage directly with crypto firms. It has hosted roundtables, issued detailed guidance and published its phased “Crypto Roadmap” to improve transparency.
This effort has built confidence among businesses and investors, even if not all agree with the regulator’s proposals. Yet, questions remain over proportionality. Larger firms may be able to absorb compliance costs, but smaller startups risk being priced out of the UK market entirely.
Learning From Global Peers
Across the globe, other regulators are moving faster. The EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) offers a comprehensive rulebook, while the U.S. CLARITY and GENIUS Acts signal a push toward leadership in digital assets. Singapore has introduced rigorous licensing, regulatory sandboxes and pilot programs to encourage responsible innovation.
If Britain continues to delay, the so-called “second-mover advantage” could become a disadvantage. While learning from others’ experiences is valuable, hesitation risks permanently eroding the UK’s competitive edge.
A Narrowing Window of Opportunity
The UK has the financial infrastructure and talent to lead, but ambition alone will not secure that position. Greater coordination between government and regulator is essential to build a framework that is clear, fair and globally competitive.
The FCA has laid groundwork, but without swift legislative backing, the UK’s vision of becoming a global crypto leader may remain only a slogan.
Share This
